Monday, October 25, 2010

Inside the sexy new $100 bill



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

bad debt bad debts junk debt buyers debt buyers

Why it's time to be bullish

chart_running_bulls_2.top.gif Paul J. Lim, senior editor

(Money Magazine) -- On paper, this seems like a hospitable environment for the bulls on Wall Street to roam. The recession that began in late 2007 has officially been declared over. Interest rates and inflation are at historic lows, and stocks are up more than 70% from their low 18 months ago.

But when you flip on CNBC or turn to your paper's business section, it's all gloom and anxiety. The talking heads are warning that the economy could be headed for a double-dip recession or maybe something worse.

Meanwhile, mutual fund managers are sitting on cash, and a recent survey of investment newsletters found that bearish advisers vastly outnumbered bulls for the first time since the market cratered in March 2009.

Individual investors have caught the pessimism bug too: At the end of August, only 21% of individual investors described themselves as being bullish, vs. about 50% who said they were bearish.

That spread between optimists and pessimists hasn't been so wide since the credit crisis nearly two years ago. Since the start of 2009, $70 billion has been yanked out of U.S. stock mutual funds while more than half a trillion dollars has gone into bonds.

"Sometimes it feels like I'm the last optimist standing," says University of Pennsylvania professor Jeremy Siegel, whose book Stocks for the Long Run was the bible of '90s bulls.

Now a puzzle: If investors are feeling so crabby, why aren't stocks cratering? It could be that they're caught up in the market's mixed signals. It's unclear right now whether you can consider the broad market cheap or dear.

So while there's no obvious rationale to sell just now, it might just take a little bit of bad news -- such as a surprisingly bad earnings report -- to send investors running. But there's also a strong counterargument that the dearth of bulls is a good sign. Four reasons not to listen too closely to the bears:

Right now there's an overhang of fear in the market that's not justified by companies' fundamentals. People's anxiety about their own jobs and the economy is probably spilling over into their portfolios.

And David Kotok, chief investment officer of Cumberland Advisors, says investors are still gripped by "financial post-traumatic stress disorder" left over from the 2008 crisis.

But as a group, investors' emotional weathervanes very often point the wrong way.

For example, at the end of the bear market in March 2009 the pessimists outnumbered the optimists by nearly 2 to 1. Yet in the 12 months that followed, the Standard & Poor's 500 index soared more than 60%.

Similarly, in October 2002 the number of bearish investors greatly outnumbered the bulls just as the stock market was about to enter a five-year rally. And on the flip side, asks Siegel, "How many bears could you find in tech stocks in March 2000?" Not many, but that was just before the Internet bubble burst.

How to play it: This adds up to a case for sticking by your stock allocation. But recognize that fragile investor sentiment could lead to a short-run market drop. That would be a timely occasion to book some profits in bonds and recommit that money to stocks.

"If you focus solely on the economy, you could get bearish," says Ronald Muhlenkamp, manager of the Muhlenkamp Fund. "But when you look at the health of companies themselves, it's very easy to get bullish."

For one thing, after getting out from under debt over the past two years, corporations are now sitting on more than $1 trillion in cash.

Ironically, a big reason investors are so worried about the economy is that corporations are doing too good a job sticking to their financial diets. As companies both big and small have gotten rid of debt at a record pace, they've simultaneously cut back cold turkey on spending and investing, which is one reason cash reserves are soaring.

The good news is that some of this cash is starting to come off the sidelines and is being deployed in ways that could benefit you.

For instance, as merger-and-acquisition activity has begun to pick up recently, stock prices have also begun to rise. In addition, companies in the S&P 500 have boosted their dividend payments by nearly $14 billion so far this year, after slashing their payouts by $37 billion in 2009. Dividend-paying stocks have returned more than 10% this year, three times the return of the broad market.

How to play it: First, take a look at tech stocks. The sector, which used to shun dividends, now accounts for nearly 10% of the S&P's payouts, as industry titans like Intel (INTC, Fortune 500) are kicking back more cash to their shareholders.

In May, Intel said the company would double its earnings over the next five years. Even if the company can't achieve this through simple growth, it has enough cash to buy back stock and double per-share profits. "Meanwhile, you're getting paid a 3.3% yield to wait," says Robert Turner of Turner Investment Partners.

If you'd rather invest in tech via a fund, Technology Select Sector SPDR (XLK) is an exchange-traded fund with a focus on larger companies. For a more diversified play on dividends, consider Vanguard Dividend Growth (VDIGX). Unlike many dividend funds, it doesn't just buy stocks with the highest yields, but includes newly emerging -- and faster-growing -- dividend payers.

At least the global economy isn't. Take Europe, for example. While southern European countries were walloped by a debt crisis earlier this year, the region appears to have addressed many of those concerns.

In September, the European Commission nearly doubled its forecast for the region's growth this year, from 0.9% to 1.7%. Beyond Europe, the global economy is expected to grow at least 3.5% a year through 2014, which is about a third faster than projections for the U.S.

How to play it: Think European-based multinationals. Though European stocks are rebounding, they're still cheap. Historically they've traded at a 15% premium to the S&P; today they're even.

Kotok likes Siemens, which is based in Germany, one of the region's strongest economies. The giant diversified manufacturer is growing 15% a year but trades at a P/E of less than 12. If you prefer funds, Vanguard Europe Pacific ETF is a MONEY 70 choice with two-thirds of its stake in Europe.

While there's great debate whether the broad stock market can be viewed as cheap, it's still easy to find attractively priced stocks right now. Bill Miller of Legg Mason Capital Management, a famous bull from the 1990s, argued in a recent commentary that some of the biggest high-quality U.S. firms are as cheap as they've been since 1951.

How to play it: Following a maverick like Miller is risky. His main fund lost big in 2008 as he stuck by financial stocks. But he also has a record of spotting huge opportunities others have missed, and his case for Exxon Mobil (XOM, Fortune 500) is intriguing. He notes it's cheaper now than it was during the financial panic. �To top of page



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

lvnv funding lvnv nco financial debt

Short Sales Resisted Foreclosures Are Revived

junk debt buyers debt buyers debt collectors debts

MTV Is Looking Beyond ?Jersey Shore? to Build a Wider Audience

Instead, in every commercial break, MTV promoted ?Skins,? a remake of a scripted British series about the sexually charged trials of teenage life that is scheduled to make its debut in January.

?We were using one of our biggest moments of the year to loudly shout about a very different kind of show,? said Stephen K. Friedman, MTV?s general manager.

MTV is enjoying a renaissance. Written off as irrelevant just a few years ago, the channel was resuscitated this year by the rambunctious cast of ?Jersey Shore? and the young parents on ?Teen Mom.?

Lest it rely too heavily on those shows, MTV is rapidly diversifying its slate of programs, ?Skins? being one example.

?We?re in a constant state of reinvention,? said Van Toffler, the president of MTV Networks Music/Film/Logo Group.

Mr. Toffler is fond of saying that MTV executives have to ?embrace the chaos,? especially because MTV has a fickle young audience.

Advertisers and analysts have taken note of the revival. Benjamin Swinburne, a media analyst for Morgan Stanley, said ?there?s no question that ?Jersey Shore? has been the catalyst? for ratings gains at MTV.

?But they?ve been able to build off that by taking some intelligent risks,? he added.

Investors expect advertising growth to accelerate in the next two quarters at MTV and its parent, MTV Networks, which is owned by Viacom.

Cast members like Nicole Polizzi, better known as Snooki, from ?Jersey Shore? get some of the credit, but the rebound is also a result of rethinking the channel?s programs for the millennial generation, as those born in the 1980s and ?90s are sometimes called.

It is happening at a time of wholesale revamping within MTV. A year ago, Tony DiSanto, president of programming, approached Mr. Toffler about wanting to set up his own production company. Mr. Toffler asked him to stay on while MTV strengthened its programming leadership. That is what the last year has been about, as a half-dozen new executives have been hired away from Warner Brothers, E! and elsewhere. Mr. DiSanto will leave at the end of the year.

Under the new guard, flashy reality shows are out ? ?The Hills,? once a flagship franchise for MTV, wrapped up last summer ? and a new buzzword, ?authenticity,? is in. It is shorthand for a new ?filter? for MTV?s programming decisions.

Until this year, MTV had been shedding viewers for the better part of a decade, falling to an average of 481,000 at any given time in 2009 from an average of 636,000 in 2005. MTV, which the MTV Networks chief executive, Judy McGrath, has said should be the ?forever young network,? had clung to Generation X a little too long, some believed, at the expense of the millennials.

Compounding the problem, there was a perception that MTV was flailing online, where its audience was spending more and more time.

?We were the company that didn?t get MySpace,? said Ms. McGrath, referring to Viacom?s failed bid for the social networking site. News Corporation acquired MySpace, instead, and the site has since withered. ?I don?t think about that anymore,? she said in an interview last week.

MTV?s music Web sites now have more than 60 million unique monthly visitors.

Mr. Friedman, the former head of MTV?s college channel mtvU, was put in charge of MTV in 2008, after Christina Norman departed to take over Oprah Winfrey?s forthcoming cable channel. He said he sensed that ?reality was starting to feel really unreal to our audience,? citing the show ?Paris Hilton?s My New BFF.? No one believed Ms. Hilton would actually find her new best friend through a reality show.

At the same time, the actual reality shows on MTV ? unglamorous stalwarts like ?Made? and ?True Life? ? were picking up new viewers.

?They were inspirational, authentic stories,? Mr. Toffler said. The channel saw a way forward, and most of its new reality shows, like ?The Buried Life,? ?World of Jenks? and ?If You Really Knew Me,? share that DNA.

As a result of MTV?s research about the millennial generation, Mr. Toffler and Mr. Friedman said they had come away thinking that teenagers and twentysomethings nowadays were less rebellious than those in the past. They are not rebelling against their parents so much as they are watching TV with their parents.

These insights have informed the development of new shows, including ?Jersey Shore,? which was first conceived as a reality competition show for MTV?s slightly older-skewing sibling, VH1. Mr. Toffler decided to redevelop it for MTV, and what changed says a lot about the channel today.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

lvnv funding lvnv nco financial debt

Money's new More Money blog

Nearly 60% of independent advisers think a double-dip recession is unlikely over the next six months, and more than 60% expect the S&P to increase in the same period, according to a survey released recently by Charles Schwab.

But don't go betting the farm on these optimistic findings just yet.� A look at the results from January's survey of advisers shows that they aren't necessarily the best augurs. In that earlier survey, 49% of advisers expected inflation to increase in the next six months (it hasn't); 47% expected consumer spending to increase (it hasn't); and 40% expected unemployment to increase (it hasn't). Advisers did get some things right, though. In the January survey, 59% expected consumer savings to increase in the next six months (it did); and 46% thought the housing market would continue to soften (it has).

Schwab acknowledges that the survey has limited forecasting value. "We're thinking [the study] is more like a national view of what's going on," says Bernie Clark, executive vice president for Charles Schwab Advisor Services. "It's not a predictor as much as where we think that the trends are taking us."

And what looks like the dominant trend these days? The biggest challenge facing advisers and their clients right now, Clark says, is what he calls the "uncertainty factor." About half of advisers' clients feel less optimistic about the economy than they did in 2009. Forty percent of advisers say their clients are less optimistic about their investment performance than they were six months ago, and 50% of advisers say their clients feel less confident they'll be able to retire when they want to. Advisers report that 47% of clients are reducing expenses, and more than half are spending less on discretionary items.

Advisers have their own doubts, too. Seventy-one percent say it will be difficult to achieve their clients' financial goals. That's down from the 84% who held that opinion in early 2009, but up from the 58% who expressed these doubts earlier this year.

In any case, people are increasingly turning to independent advisers for help with financial planning. More than 9 in 10 advisers said they received new assets in the past six months.

For the record, the sector of the market that advisers think will perform the strongest over the next six months is information technology, cited by 47% of them. Of course, if you have your doubts about advisers' predictive powers (see above), maybe you'd also like to know the sector in which they have the least confidence. And that's consumer discretionary?the pick of only 9% of professionals. Check back in six months to judge their accuracy.

Follow More Money on Twitter at http://twitter.com/moremoneyblog.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

debt collectors debts junk debt old debt

Inside the sexy new $100 bill



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

lvnv funding lvnv nco financial debt

WORLD FOREX: Dollar Sell-Off Resumes After G20; Data Cut Declines - Wall Street Journal

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.

bad debt bad debts junk debt buyers debt buyers

Cyber-shop without getting scammed

online_shopping2.ju.top.jpgAs the online buying season kicks into high gear, scammers are out in force. By Ismat Sarah Mangla, writer

(MONEY Magazine) -- Here are six steps consumers can use to protect themselves from scammers as the online buying season kicks into high gear:

Be leery. Don't open attachments or click on links if they seem at all suspicious. Doing so could let spyware or viruses in. "If you have a shred of doubt about the legitimacy of an attachment, delete it and call the friend who sent it," says Michael Kaiser, executive director of the National Cyber Security Alliance.

Invest in protection. Buy a full suite of security software ($30 to $80 a year; top brands include Symantec, McAfee, and Webroot), including antivirus and anti-spyware software. That should help keep out programs that log your keystrokes to steal passwords and financial info.

Stay up to date. Your web browser and operating system are also vital to protecting your information. Make sure both are configured to get updates from the manufacturer automatically. With a PC, look for a box to check in your preferences or control settings.

Go direct. To steer clear of websites that look like Amazon.com, say, or BestBuy.com but are actually fakes set up to steal your data, don't click on links to get to those e-commerce sites. Type the URL directly into your browser instead.

Scan for security. Once you're checking out, be sure that you're on a secure page. The address should begin with "https," not "http." The "s" indicates an encrypted connection, so even if your financial information is intercepted, it can't be read. A gold lock on the bottom of the page signals the same thing.

Never shop in public. Your computer is more vulnerable on a public wireless network -- you don't know what security is in place. Adds Murray Jennex, an information systems professor at San Diego State University: "I wouldn't do credit card transactions on a cellphone or via Bluetooth either."

Use the right card. Pay with a credit card, and by law you'll be liable for no more than $50 in fraudulent charges. Using a debit card is stickier. Though MasterCard and Visa match the liability cap, the overall legal protections aren't as strong. And once the money is gone from your bank account, you could face delays and hassles in getting it back.

Get a one-time number. Several credit card issuers, including Bank of America, Citibank, and Discover, will give you an account number that becomes invalid after one use. (Call customer service to find out more.) If anyone steals that number, it's useless.

Work with a middleman. You can store your credit card or bank account information with a third-party payment system and let that site deal with the store. PayPal is the most widely used; Google Checkout is similar, though fewer sites accept it. �To top of page



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

debt bad debt bad debts junk debt buyers

Robert Lenzner: China Needs to Hit the Brakes; US Needs to Step on the Gas

nco financial debt bad debt bad debts

Health Care: Will Employers Drop Coverage As Reforms Are Enacted?

debt collectors debts junk debt old debt

The Real Price Tag of Luxury Cars

If you're in the market for a luxury vehicle, don't just consider a car's sticker price or monthly lease rate. You should also compare the total cost of ownership for various cars over the long-term, such as fuel, insurance and repair bills, says David Wurster, head of product development and industry analysis for Vincentric, which measures ownership costs over time.

All things being equal, for instance, you might choose the Mercedes GLK over the Lexus RX 350, because the former is the lowest-priced midsize luxury crossover. The Mercedes has an average market price of $33,709, while the Lexus sells for an average $35,542. But when you factor in the five-year cost of ownership for both vehicles, the Lexus turns out to be the better bargain. It will cost $52,381 to own over five years, compared with $53,361 for the Mercedes. Or you might consider the Infiniti EX 35, which sells for an average of $33,854, just a bit more than the Mercedes, but has the lowest cost of ownership in the segment at $50,704.

In Pictures: The Most Expensive Luxury Cars To Own

Of course, buying a car, especially a luxury model, isn't always just about dollars and cents. Cars are fashion statements, and the brand you choose says a lot about you. Nonetheless, even the wealthy like to get a good deal, and that's why it's important to weigh the total cost of ownership. "Vehicles may cost less out the door, but cost you more over the long term," says Wurster.

The Land Rover LR4 is the lowest-priced midsize luxury SUV at $51,008. But its total cost of ownership, at $73,472, is higher than Land Cruiser, which sells for about $10,500 more. The Land Cruiser's five-year ownership cost is $71,507.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

debt buyers debt collectors debts junk debt

G-20 Vows To Avoid Currency Devaluations

debt buyers debt collectors debts junk debt

David Bank: Carrots, Not Sticks, for Longer Working Lives

debt bad debt bad debts junk debt buyers

Obama Weekly Address: GOP Will Try To Repeal Wall Street Reform (VIDEO)

old debt lvnv funding lvnv nco financial

David Isenberg: Be Careful What You Ask For

lvnv funding lvnv nco financial debt

Cyber-shop without getting scammed

online_shopping2.ju.top.jpgAs the online buying season kicks into high gear, scammers are out in force. By Ismat Sarah Mangla, writer

(MONEY Magazine) -- Here are six steps consumers can use to protect themselves from scammers as the online buying season kicks into high gear:

Be leery. Don't open attachments or click on links if they seem at all suspicious. Doing so could let spyware or viruses in. "If you have a shred of doubt about the legitimacy of an attachment, delete it and call the friend who sent it," says Michael Kaiser, executive director of the National Cyber Security Alliance.

Invest in protection. Buy a full suite of security software ($30 to $80 a year; top brands include Symantec, McAfee, and Webroot), including antivirus and anti-spyware software. That should help keep out programs that log your keystrokes to steal passwords and financial info.

Stay up to date. Your web browser and operating system are also vital to protecting your information. Make sure both are configured to get updates from the manufacturer automatically. With a PC, look for a box to check in your preferences or control settings.

Go direct. To steer clear of websites that look like Amazon.com, say, or BestBuy.com but are actually fakes set up to steal your data, don't click on links to get to those e-commerce sites. Type the URL directly into your browser instead.

Scan for security. Once you're checking out, be sure that you're on a secure page. The address should begin with "https," not "http." The "s" indicates an encrypted connection, so even if your financial information is intercepted, it can't be read. A gold lock on the bottom of the page signals the same thing.

Never shop in public. Your computer is more vulnerable on a public wireless network -- you don't know what security is in place. Adds Murray Jennex, an information systems professor at San Diego State University: "I wouldn't do credit card transactions on a cellphone or via Bluetooth either."

Use the right card. Pay with a credit card, and by law you'll be liable for no more than $50 in fraudulent charges. Using a debit card is stickier. Though MasterCard and Visa match the liability cap, the overall legal protections aren't as strong. And once the money is gone from your bank account, you could face delays and hassles in getting it back.

Get a one-time number. Several credit card issuers, including Bank of America, Citibank, and Discover, will give you an account number that becomes invalid after one use. (Call customer service to find out more.) If anyone steals that number, it's useless.

Work with a middleman. You can store your credit card or bank account information with a third-party payment system and let that site deal with the store. PayPal is the most widely used; Google Checkout is similar, though fewer sites accept it. �To top of page



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

lvnv nco financial debt bad debt

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Companies That Received Bailout Money Giving Generously To Candidates

bad debt bad debts junk debt buyers debt buyers

Singapore Exchange Offers To Buy ASX For A$8.4 Bln - Wall Street Journal

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.

debt collectors debts junk debt old debt

Companies That Received Bailout Money Giving Generously To Candidates

old debt lvnv funding lvnv nco financial

The Real Price Tag of Luxury Cars

If you're in the market for a luxury vehicle, don't just consider a car's sticker price or monthly lease rate. You should also compare the total cost of ownership for various cars over the long-term, such as fuel, insurance and repair bills, says David Wurster, head of product development and industry analysis for Vincentric, which measures ownership costs over time.

All things being equal, for instance, you might choose the Mercedes GLK over the Lexus RX 350, because the former is the lowest-priced midsize luxury crossover. The Mercedes has an average market price of $33,709, while the Lexus sells for an average $35,542. But when you factor in the five-year cost of ownership for both vehicles, the Lexus turns out to be the better bargain. It will cost $52,381 to own over five years, compared with $53,361 for the Mercedes. Or you might consider the Infiniti EX 35, which sells for an average of $33,854, just a bit more than the Mercedes, but has the lowest cost of ownership in the segment at $50,704.

In Pictures: The Most Expensive Luxury Cars To Own

Of course, buying a car, especially a luxury model, isn't always just about dollars and cents. Cars are fashion statements, and the brand you choose says a lot about you. Nonetheless, even the wealthy like to get a good deal, and that's why it's important to weigh the total cost of ownership. "Vehicles may cost less out the door, but cost you more over the long term," says Wurster.

The Land Rover LR4 is the lowest-priced midsize luxury SUV at $51,008. But its total cost of ownership, at $73,472, is higher than Land Cruiser, which sells for about $10,500 more. The Land Cruiser's five-year ownership cost is $71,507.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

junk debt old debt lvnv funding lvnv

Sky High Prices: U.S. Cities With Highest Rent

San Jose, Calif. is famous for tech startups and good living. Corporate heavyweights including , and are headquartered there, and some of the country's brightest minds flock to the southern end of the San Francisco Bay to make their careers.

But geographic desirability and concentration of highly skilled workers don't come cheap. Rents in San Jose are the highest in the country--and they keep climbing. The city's $1,340 median monthly rent is up 5% over last year.

Pinched housing supply in the city keeps leases pricey--and as the local housing market recovers, rents in sought-after spots like San Jose have shot up faster than home prices.

In Pictures: Where The Rents Are Highest

Using the latest data from the United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey--a study performed every year with a sampling of American citizens that represents the total population--we ranked the country's 100 largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas by their median monthly contract rent (base rent, not including extras like utilities and fuel).

About 350 miles south of San Jose, in the suburbs of Los Angeles, is the city with the second highest rent in the country: Thousand Oaks, Calif., with median rent of $1,301 per month. In fact, half of our high-rent cities are located in the state of California; the state's desirable weather and cultural amenities amplify demand, and its coastal location means there's limited space to build, cutting down on supply. A recent drop in homeownership and shift toward renting compounds the increase.

"In California, apartment rental rates remain relatively strong," says Stuart Gabriel, director of the Ziman Center for real estate at the University of California Los Angeles, who also cites "dampened expectations of returns to homeownership over the coming years and record low levels of rental housing development" as reasons rental costs are high.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

junk debt old debt lvnv funding lvnv

Social Security Strategies and Roth IRA Conversions: Wall Street Journal Advice - Wall Street Journal

My husband began collecting his Social Security benefits at full retirement age in 1990. He is now 84 years old, and his monthly net Social Security is $1,022. I am 62, and at my full retirement age of 66 in 2014 my projected Social Security is $2,141.

At my full retirement age, can I choose to take a spousal benefit only and allow my own benefits to grow until age 70? Will my husband's Social Security be reduced if I take a spousal benefit? Or would I be better off collecting my individual Social Security at 66?

SALLY ENGLAND
Easton, Conn.

Given the wide spread in age between you and your husband, your decision about when to file for Social Security should take into account the possibility that you will survive him by many years. With that in mind, you should aim to secure the biggest monthly Social Security check as possible for your later years. And based on the numbers you've supplied, the way to do that would be by maximizing your earned benefit by waiting until age 70 to collect it.

For a wife who is significantly younger and also has substantial earnings, that can be a strategy for "creating the biggest benefit for herself," says James Mahaney, a vice president at Prudential Financial Inc. who has studied Social Security claiming strategies.

Moreover, that doesn't mean you have to wait to age 70 to collect any benefit. As you note, at your full retirement age of 66 you can file to collect only your spousal benefit based on your husband's record. That would not have any effect on the benefit that he would continue to collect. (If you were to file for benefits before full retirement age, you would be considered to be also filing for your earned benefit, which would then be permanently reduced.)

My wife and I are attempting to determine how best to have our estate divided in the event of both of our deaths. In that case, we would wish to divide our assets among a few family members with a large portion also going to select charities.

Given that our assets would be divided among individuals and charities, what considerations should be made in leaving either sheltered or non-sheltered assets to either in order to make it as tax-advantageous as possible to the recipients?

LARRY STEFANICH
Marengo, Ohio

Tax-deferred accounts?including 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts funded with deductible contributions?"are great for charitable giving," says Alan Acker, the judge of the Franklin County, Ohio, probate court. Not-for-profit recipients can liquidate the accounts immediately without having to pay any tax. By contrast, if those assets were to go to individuals, the recipients would owe tax at ordinary-income rates as money is withdrawn?although they could stretch those distributions out over many years.

Family members would generally face more favorable tax treatment on other assets. Still, "the law is a little tricky right now," says Craig Janes, the head of the estate-planning group at Deloitte Tax LLP. In years past?and starting again next year? most property passes to heirs with a cost basis for tax purposes equal to the fair market value at the date of death.

That means your family members would have the option to sell inherited assets immediately without owing a lot of tax. And the tax rates on capital gains are lower than on ordinary income.

But this year, in conjunction with a one-year lapse in the estate tax, assets over certain thresholds pass to heirs with the decedent's cost basis. If securities were purchased many years ago, that could mean a substantial tax hit for heirs who want to sell.

What is the procedure for "recharacterization" of a Roth conversion in 2010? When is the cutoff? Is there any penalty?

I converted part of my traditional IRA to a Roth early in January this year, but if the stock market heads lower, I'll need to move the conversion back to my traditional IRA to avoid paying tax on inflated asset values.

IRENE CHANG
Cincinnati

You've got a long window of time in which to decide whether to undo your 2010 Roth conversion?all the way to Oct. 15, 2011, the deadline (including extensions) for filing 2010 tax returns. There is no tax or penalty involved in taking advantage of that do-over opportunity. And if you recharacterize your new Roth IRA as a traditional IRA, you could later reconvert to a Roth; if the account value had shrunk, you would have less taxable income the second time around.

But there are timing issues to consider. If you undo a Roth conversion, you can't reconvert until the later of two dates: the start of the calendar year after your initial Roth conversion, or 30 days after you undid the conversion.

In your case, and for anyone else who converted to a Roth this year, no matter when you undo the conversion, the earliest you will be allowed to reconvert is in January 2011. No one knows where the market will stand then. Also, there is a special tax advantage only for Roth conversions performed this year: You have the option of having the conversion income split between the 2011 and 2012 tax years. If you undo your conversion, you'll no longer have that option.

Next welcomes your questions at next@wsj.com. Ms. Damato is a Wall Street Journal news editor in South Brunswick, N.J.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.

lvnv nco financial debt bad debt

Foreclosure Mess Could Be Easy To Cure And Pose Big Problems For Banks Involved

old debt lvnv funding lvnv nco financial

Cyber-shop without getting scammed

online_shopping2.ju.top.jpgAs the online buying season kicks into high gear, scammers are out in force. By Ismat Sarah Mangla, writer

(MONEY Magazine) -- Here are six steps consumers can use to protect themselves from scammers as the online buying season kicks into high gear:

Be leery. Don't open attachments or click on links if they seem at all suspicious. Doing so could let spyware or viruses in. "If you have a shred of doubt about the legitimacy of an attachment, delete it and call the friend who sent it," says Michael Kaiser, executive director of the National Cyber Security Alliance.

Invest in protection. Buy a full suite of security software ($30 to $80 a year; top brands include Symantec, McAfee, and Webroot), including antivirus and anti-spyware software. That should help keep out programs that log your keystrokes to steal passwords and financial info.

Stay up to date. Your web browser and operating system are also vital to protecting your information. Make sure both are configured to get updates from the manufacturer automatically. With a PC, look for a box to check in your preferences or control settings.

Go direct. To steer clear of websites that look like Amazon.com, say, or BestBuy.com but are actually fakes set up to steal your data, don't click on links to get to those e-commerce sites. Type the URL directly into your browser instead.

Scan for security. Once you're checking out, be sure that you're on a secure page. The address should begin with "https," not "http." The "s" indicates an encrypted connection, so even if your financial information is intercepted, it can't be read. A gold lock on the bottom of the page signals the same thing.

Never shop in public. Your computer is more vulnerable on a public wireless network -- you don't know what security is in place. Adds Murray Jennex, an information systems professor at San Diego State University: "I wouldn't do credit card transactions on a cellphone or via Bluetooth either."

Use the right card. Pay with a credit card, and by law you'll be liable for no more than $50 in fraudulent charges. Using a debit card is stickier. Though MasterCard and Visa match the liability cap, the overall legal protections aren't as strong. And once the money is gone from your bank account, you could face delays and hassles in getting it back.

Get a one-time number. Several credit card issuers, including Bank of America, Citibank, and Discover, will give you an account number that becomes invalid after one use. (Call customer service to find out more.) If anyone steals that number, it's useless.

Work with a middleman. You can store your credit card or bank account information with a third-party payment system and let that site deal with the store. PayPal is the most widely used; Google Checkout is similar, though fewer sites accept it. �To top of page



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

debts junk debt old debt lvnv funding

Inside the sexy new $100 bill



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

debt bad debt bad debts junk debt buyers

Unemployed Law Student Wants Money Back

A Boston College law student unhappy with his job prospects has made the prestigious university an offer: return his money and he'll forfeit his degree.

\n\n\n\n

The proposition was made in an open letter written by the student anonymously, identified only as a third-year law school student, and posted last week on the law school's independent student-run website, Eagleionline.

The letter, addressed to the school's Interim Dean George Brown, explains how the student is unable to support his wife and the baby they're expecting and is in "an enormous amount of debt" from his time at Boston College.

"With fatherhood impending, I go to bed every night terrified of the thought of trying to provide for my child AND paying off my J.D, and resentful at the thought that I was convinced to go to law school by empty promises of a fulfilling and remunerative career," the student, who says he's set to graduate in 2011, writes.

In the letter the student criticizes the university's career services department saying that he and his peers have received "little help" to cope with their "financial disasters."

One year at Boston College Law School, including tuition and housing, costs about $60,000, according to the school's website.

"I'd like to propose a solution to this problem: I am willing to leave law school, without a degree, at the end of this semester," writes the student. "In return, I would like a full refund of the tuition I've paid over the last two and a half years."

Repeated requests by ABC News to interview the student were declined. Brown was also not made available for an interview, but a spokesman for the law school issued a written statement.

"As a Jesuit law school, we are deeply concerned about the job prospects and general well-being of our students and our recent graduates," said Nate Kenyon, the director of communications at Boston College. "The job market in the legal profession and beyond has been severely affected by the current economic downturn, which has resulted in one of the most difficult employment climates in the past 70 years, not only for BC Law, but for all schools across the nation."



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

junk debt old debt lvnv funding lvnv

Housing Advocate Praises Bank of America

Even as Bank of America prepares to move forward with more than 100,000 foreclosure filings, the head of the country's leading housing counseling agency praised the bank -- calling it the best among its peers in working with the agency to keep people in their homes.

\n\n\n\n

The Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, or NACA, holds events across the country that bring banks, housing counselors and homeowners together to restructure unaffordable mortgages.

In a tough economy, some economists say banks would rather make less money on a mortgage than force people out of their homes -- and then be stuck trying to sell them. Others say major lenders have been geared for maximum profit, and aren't changing now.

"The best bank that we work with during the events that is getting it done is Bank of America, by far," NACA CEO Bruce Marks said in an interview. "They are much more responsive to addressing the issues."

Marks said that of the thousands of Bank of America customers who attend the events, 60 percent receive approvals for loan modifications within a day. Wells Fargo comes second, offering "same day solutions" to about 40 percent of its customers at NACA events, he said. The 12 to 15 mortgage lenders present at most events -- including Citigroup and the mortgage lending arms of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley -- average about a 30 percent same-day approval rate.

The reason banks are able to offer speedy approvals at the NACA events, Marks said, is that NACA counselors work with homeowners to determine how much they can afford to pay each month. They then bring this information, along with necessary documentation like income statements, to bank staffers, who approve interest rate reductions and, in some cases, principal reductions.

"We do the work, and they do the approval," he said.

Banks like BofA pay NACA a fee -- between $500 and $750 -- for every loan modification in which customers make on-time payments for at least three months. In a separate program, NACA also helps broker new loans for Bank of America and Citigroup, a service for which the group is paid $2,500 per loan.

Marks said his group's financial relationship with Bank of America did not influence his glowing assessment of the bank.

Bank of America has the highest same-day approval rate, Marks said, because the bank is "the most open to new ideas and new ways of doing it."



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

old debt lvnv funding lvnv nco financial

Seven-Time Lotto Winner Shares His Method

How does one person win the lottery again and again? Richard Lustig says he knows.

\n\n\n\n

In "Learn How to Increase Your Chances of Winning the Lottery," Lustig -- who has won the grand prize seven times -- shares the strategy he calls "the winning lottery method."

It's a formula that he says has earned him more than $1 million.

"[Playing the lotto is] like any investment. You have to invest money to get something out of it," says Lustig, 59, a former singer and drummer from Florida.

"Most people buy a $1 ticket and win $10 and they put the $10 in their pocket," says Lustig. Those people are playing the game wrong. Instead, he says, if you win $10, then you should buy $11 worth of tickets because "if you lose, you only lost a $1."

The process earned him $98,000 after he played the Fantasy 5 game in Florida. "I use lottery money all the time to buy more tickets," says Lustig.

It's also the method that won him his biggest prize, more than $842,000 in 2002. The first prize he took home was in 1992, for $10,000. With hospital bills coming in from the birth of his son, the winnings couldn't have come at a better time.

Before then, Lustig says he spent most of the time losing before deciding there had to be a way to improve your chances. For him, playing the lottery is similar to a full job. It's a daily process that involves dedicating hours to the game.

"I don't guarantee or make promises to anybody that by following my method you're going to win the lottery," says Lustig. "I'm not a scam artist. I'm telling people exactly the truth -- that they will definitely increase their chances of winning" using his lottery method.

After developing the method over the years and selling thousands of copies of his report, Lustig decided to write a 40-page book explaining his formula. The game of chance, or what some call luck, is what Lustig addresses in his book currently ranked #3 on Amazon's self-help book list.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

debt buyers debt collectors debts junk debt

Inside the sexy new $100 bill



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

nco financial debt bad debt bad debts

Obama Blasts Republican Economic Policies: GOP 'Snake Oil' Could Jeopardize Economy

lvnv nco financial debt bad debt

Foreclosure Mess Could Be Easy To Cure And Pose Big Problems For Banks Involved

bad debts junk debt buyers debt buyers debt collectors

Steve Parker: Toyota/Honda Recall -- What's Really Happening?

lvnv nco financial debt bad debt

Tribune Takes Crucial Step to Bankruptcy Exit - Wall Street Journal

Tribune Co. late Friday filed a reorganization plan backed by its leading creditors, taking an important step toward completing a nearly two-year slog through bankruptcy.

Tribune's Quest for Bankruptcy Exit

See key developments since the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection almost two years ago.

The filing came just a few hours after the resignation of Chief Executive Randy Michaels. Together, the moves signal the beginning of the end of perhaps the darkest chapter in the media company's 163 years.

The plan incorporates the terms from two previously announced settlement pacts by the company's unsecured creditors and leading lenders. It would hand ownership of the company to holders of its senior loans, led by J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Angelo Gordon & Co. and Oaktree Capital Management.

Senior bondholders would receive $420 million, or about 33%, of what they are owed, plus a stake in a trust to fund lawsuits stemming from the buyout.

Terms of the plan filed Friday night are more generous to bondholders than a previous proposal.

The plan still must get approval from the court and creditors of the company.

Questions about the circumstances of Sam Zell's $8.2 billion deal in 2007 to take Tribune private have complicated and extended the bankruptcy proceedings. Over the summer, a court-ordered probe concluded it is "highly likely" that the second step of financing for the deal rendered Tribune insolvent.

The findings emboldened unhappy creditors, some of whom have signaled plans to bring legal action against parties involved in the original deal. To keep potential litigation from further delaying the proceedings, certain potential legal claims were set aside in a trust under the latest plan.

Earlier Friday, a bankruptcy judge granted Tribune's official committee of unsecured creditors the right to sue some of the parties that helped engineer the ill-fated buyout.

The resignation of Mr. Michaels, who has run Tribune since late last year, was hastened by tales of boorish behavior and a hostile corporate culture his team is said to have fostered. The board voted to replace Mr. Michaels with a four-man executive council comprised of current Tribune executives, a temporary arrangement designed to bring a measure of stability to the company while it tries to emerge from bankruptcy.

Mr. Michaels' departure shifts more of the focus to a task Tribune's creditors?and future owners?have been quietly working on since the summer: finding new leadership to steer the company post-bankruptcy.

The creditors have been casting about for new leadership since the summer. Recruiters Spencer Stuart proposed several potential candidates, including former News Corp. executive Peter Chernin and former Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Michael Eisner, according to a person familiar with the situation.

News Corp. owns Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal.

More recently, creditors spoke informally with Spencer Stuart about "who might be available" to fill the CEO spot, this person said.

Mr. Chernin's spokesman said he isn't interested in the CEO job. He declined to comment on whether Mr. Chernin was approached about or is interested in becoming chairman. Mr. Eisner, who invested in Tribune debt, has repeatedly dismissed speculation that he was in talks about becoming chairman of the company.

Until a few weeks ago, Mr. Michaels was expected to stay on at least until Tribune's exit from bankruptcy. Then a series of recent revelations about the culture at Tribune under Mr. Michaels' management team depicted a hostile environment plagued by inappropriate behavior. The final straw for the board was a memo sent by Mr. Michaels' chief innovation officer, Lee Abrams, that linked to a fake news video labeled "sluts" and showing nudity. Mr. Abrams apologized and subsequently resigned, but the controversy compelled the board to cut Mr. Michaels' tenure short.

The new executive council is comprised of Tony Hunter, publisher of the Chicago Tribune; Eddy Hartenstein, publisher of the Los Angeles Times; Nils Larsen, chief investment officer at Tribune; and Don Liebentritt, Tribune's chief restructuring officer. In addition, Mr. Larsen has been named chairman of Tribune Broadcasting.

"These appointments are designed to ensure a smooth, seamless transition of management responsibilities to a group of experienced executives who have a strong understanding of the company's media businesses," Mr. Zell said in a statement.

Write to Russell Adams at russell.adams@wsj.com, Joann S. Lublin at joann.lublin@wsj.com and Dee Patney at deepak.patney@dowjones.com

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.

debt collectors debts junk debt old debt

David Isenberg: Qarmat Ali AND KBR, Redux

old debt lvnv funding lvnv nco financial

Scene Stealer: When Hollywood Gives Hope to Main St.

?WANT to go the movies??

Tommy Lee Jones poses the question to Chris Cooper in ?The Company Men,? a social drama from the writer and director John Wells that is set for release in December by the Weinstein Company.

The question comes at what students of Hollywood story architecture will recognize as the bottom of the second act. That?s when things (seemingly) can?t get worse.

Mr. Jones, as the fictional Gene McClary, and Mr. Cooper, as his longtime right-hand man, Phil Woodward, are a couple of suddenly unemployed shipbuilding executives who have been drinking, philandering and otherwise acting out their rage and confusion at having lost jobs in the current economic troubles.

They?re too old to get new jobs, and too proud to stop trying. Along with Ben Affleck, who plays Bobby Walker, a sidelined fellow executive from a rapidly downsizing conglomerate, the company men McClary and Woodward are trying to jump-start new lives, while kicking some life into America?s dreary economy.

And catching a movie, as Mr. Jones suggests at that low point, might not be a bad idea ? for any of us.

Historically, the movies have helped get the country in gear when the solution to a crisis depends at least in part on new resolve and a boost to the spirits.

?We?re in the money!? Hollywood told us, with a wink, in ?Gold Diggers of 1933,? one of many films to tackle the Great Depression head-on. Come World War II, the film industry signed up with inspirational dramas like ?Casablanca? and ?Mrs. Miniver.?

In 1984, when a wave of farm foreclosures weighed on the national psyche, no fewer than three studio films ? ?The River? from Universal Pictures, ?Places in the Heart? from TriStar and ?Country? from Touchstone ? rallied support that merged with a music-driven Farm Aid campaign and culminated in the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987.

But the bewildering journey through a subprime lending crisis, a market collapse and federal bailouts, added to the lingering pain of chronic joblessness, appears to have left filmmakers at something of a loss.

They have been quick enough to spot Wall Street gone awry. This year, ?Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps,? directed by Oliver Stone, and a pair of documentaries, ?Inside Job,? directed by Charles Ferguson, and ?Client 9: The Rise and Fall of Eliot Spitzer,? directed by Alex Gibney, all chronicle in one way or another the sins of a financial industry that lost its moorings.

But the movies have offered little in the way of solace for Main Street, which has been in considerable pain since 2007.

?Up in the Air,? the 2009 Paramount Pictures film of which Jason Reitman was the director and a writer, took a jab at unemployment. But the cold brilliance of its lead character, the job-termination expert Ryan Bingham, played by George Clooney, seemed to stun more than inspire the audience, which eventually gave the film a respectable $84 million in domestic ticket sales.

Mostly, Hollywood has offered escape into fantasies like ?Avatar,? ?Toy Story 3,? ?Iron Man 2? and the ?Twilight? series. But in directing his first feature, Mr. Wells, the well-regarded writer-producer behind television series like ?Southland,? ?ER? and ?The West Wing,? couldn?t resist a long tradition in which Hollywood film has tried to join us in coping with trouble.

?There?s a light at the end of the tunnel,? Mr. Wells said in a recent telephone interview, describing ?The Company Men? and its underlying lesson. ?There?s a resilience in the American character that the movie is trying to celebrate.?

In truth, Mr. Wells said, events overtook the movie ? on which he had been working even before job losses and the financial crisis became the stuff of headlines in 2008. Several years ago, he said, a brother-in-law who worked as an electrical engineer lost his job, and pointed Mr. Wells toward Internet chat rooms where the unemployed were discussing their experiences.

Mr. Wells put a query on the Web about job loss, and in the first weekend got more than 2,000 responses.

A common thread was that people ?felt as if they?d done something wrong; they felt shame,? he said.

A sense of shared experience clings to the film, which was produced on a modest budget of less than $20 million. Its stars, including Kevin Costner, who appears as a gruff but good-hearted construction contractor, worked for a small fraction of the salaries they usually command. In a series of test screenings, Mr. Wells said, panels of viewers were asked whether they knew someone like the unemployed company men in the movie. ?Every single hand went up,? he said.

LIKE most Hollywood filmmakers, whose first mission is to entertain, Mr. Wells is wary of setting up ?The Company Men? as a message movie. (It won?t spoil the plot to say the guys mostly pull through.)

?I?m always very careful,? he cautioned, ?about making it seem like a film or a piece of literature is telling you to eat your vegetables.?

But, he said, it may be time for the movies to take a look at what?s happening on underemployed Main Street, and to applaud those fighting their way out of the problem. ?One of the things that makes America great is that we actually do kind of suck it up,? he said.

And, who knows? A good movie might move us, and our dismal economy, through the bottom of the second act.



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

debt buyers debt collectors debts junk debt

Unemployed Law Student Wants Money Back

A Boston College law student unhappy with his job prospects has made the prestigious university an offer: return his money and he'll forfeit his degree.

\n\n\n\n

The proposition was made in an open letter written by the student anonymously, identified only as a third-year law school student, and posted last week on the law school's independent student-run website, Eagleionline.

The letter, addressed to the school's Interim Dean George Brown, explains how the student is unable to support his wife and the baby they're expecting and is in "an enormous amount of debt" from his time at Boston College.

"With fatherhood impending, I go to bed every night terrified of the thought of trying to provide for my child AND paying off my J.D, and resentful at the thought that I was convinced to go to law school by empty promises of a fulfilling and remunerative career," the student, who says he's set to graduate in 2011, writes.

In the letter the student criticizes the university's career services department saying that he and his peers have received "little help" to cope with their "financial disasters."

One year at Boston College Law School, including tuition and housing, costs about $60,000, according to the school's website.

"I'd like to propose a solution to this problem: I am willing to leave law school, without a degree, at the end of this semester," writes the student. "In return, I would like a full refund of the tuition I've paid over the last two and a half years."

Repeated requests by ABC News to interview the student were declined. Brown was also not made available for an interview, but a spokesman for the law school issued a written statement.

"As a Jesuit law school, we are deeply concerned about the job prospects and general well-being of our students and our recent graduates," said Nate Kenyon, the director of communications at Boston College. "The job market in the legal profession and beyond has been severely affected by the current economic downturn, which has resulted in one of the most difficult employment climates in the past 70 years, not only for BC Law, but for all schools across the nation."



Powered by WizardRSS | Full Text RSS Feeds

junk debt buyers debt buyers debt collectors debts